The National Coalition for Dialogue Deliberation reports on the Portland City Council’s new “Public Involvement Principles.”
Next American City argues that technology in public participation is just a means to an end: you still have to get the process right.
countably infinite reflects on the tension between the notion of planning technologically-based smart, green cities and the organic messiness of how open data and open standards impact city planning in the real world.
In People & Place, Howard Silverman promotes a hybrid expert-public model of civic participation.
Augmented Reality shows off a new augmented reality kiosk application offering tantalizing possibilities for city planning visualization tools.
The Infrastructurist links to a New York Times article on a new University of Oregon “Sustainable Cities” program that taps 600 students in 25 classes to develop an economic development plan for the city of Salem and a plan to connect Salem’s parks with bicycle and pedestrian trails.
The National Charrette Institute makes the case for educating public process participants about complicated issues before the public participation process begins.






GeoDesign and Planning
Screenshot from CommunityViz 4.0 (from PlaceWays)
This past January, I had the pleasure of attending the first GeoDesign summit. I am currently working with the steering committee for next year’s GeoDesign summit and thought it would be appropriate to give a little overview of what GeoDesign is and why it is important. GeoDesign is something that people have been doing for arguably centuries. On a basic level, GeoDesign happens whenever someone considers the impact of a design. That’s a very broad definition and not one that everyone would agree with, but it is also a very loosely defined term at this moment. Read More »